The administrative profession was once a highly respected, male-dominated field. Today, it’s 98% women—and that shift has dramatically altered perception, promotion, and recognition. Understanding this history is key to addressing structural biases and valuing the work assistants truly deliver.
gender bias
When Perception Shifts: Gender Bias in the Administrative Profession
Here’s a fact many forget. The role of secretary and administrator was originally male. It was highly respected, well paid, and considered a serious profession.
Then came World War II. Men went off to fight, women stepped into those roles, and the perception of the profession shifted dramatically.
Fast forward to today. The field is 98% women. And this bias continues to shape how the role is seen.
Did you know:
• When the job title changes from assistant to administrative business partner, more men apply.
• When men join the profession, they are often promoted faster.
• I have seen senior leaders walk straight up to the male EA in a group, assuming he is the leader.
To be clear, I love the men in this profession. Most are excellent assistants. Their competence, loyalty, insight – these are assets. Their presence is welcome. But because their presence changes perception, we must call out what that change tells us.
• Studies show that women are less likely than men to be promoted, even when their job performance is equal or better.
• Women often receive higher performance ratings but lower “potential” ratings than men, which significantly affects promotion odds.
• The concept of the “glass escalator” describes how men in female-dominated professions ascend more quickly into leadership or higher-status roles.
These are not minor differences. They’re structural and persistent. They are why changing a title like “assistant” to “business partner” can shift who applies, and how seriously the role is taken.
The truth is that assistants have been driving organisational strength for decades, often without the recognition, pay, or status they deserve.
If men entering or re-entering this field cause others to suddenly “see” what’s been there all along, that tells us the problem is not the value of the work, it’s what we’ve allowed perception to become.
The Motherhood Penalty and the Assistant Profession
UK campaigner Joeli Brearley revealed this week that mothers earn 33% less than fathers — and in a profession that is 98% women, that matters. Too often, assistants are dismissed as “unambitious,” but what if that perception is simply bias in disguise? When society undervalues mothers, it undervalues women’s work — and that bias bleeds into how assistants are judged. Assistants are ambitious. They run portfolios, align leaders, and manage complexity daily. The real question isn’t why assistants don’t want to progress — it’s why ambition is still defined through a male lens.
Funny or Flawed? Why ‘Lighthearted’ Job Ads for Assistants May Be Doing More Harm Than Good
From “read minds” to “make coffee with a PhD,” job ads for administrative professionals often try to be witty—but these seemingly humorous phrases can trivialize the role, reinforce outdated stereotypes, and undermine the value assistants bring to the workplace.
Why Language Matters: Rethinking How We Describe Assistants
Calling assistants “magicians” or “work wives” may seem harmless, but it can diminish the professional expertise they bring to their roles. These terms reinforce outdated stereotypes and overlook the strategic value assistants provide. To ensure their work is respected, it’s crucial to use language that reflects their true contributions.